(July 24 -31)

A comparative poll of sorts.

Last week, our question centered on your thoughts before former special counsel Robert Mueller testified on Capitol Hill.   We wondered if you thought any new information would be provided regarding Mueller’s 2016 presidential election investigation.

Now that you have heard Mueller’s testimony, have digested the analysis, and have engaged in conversations, are you having different thoughts than prior to Mueller’s testimony?

Previous Poll:   Here are my thoughts from before and now after Mueller’s testimony?
Before Mueller’s testimony, I thought his investigation was a waste of time and resources, and now after his testimony, I still think so – 63%
Before Mueller’s testimony, I thought his investigation was a waste of time and resources, but after his testimony, I think new information has surfaced and needs more investigation – 18%
Before Mueller’s testimony, I thought his investigation was necessary and should have continued, and now after his testimony, I still think so – 14%
Before Mueller’s testimony, I thought his investigation was necessary and should have continued, but after his testimony, I think there is nothing else to discover and all investigations should end -5%